<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advisory Capitalists?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericjohnolson.com/blog/2006/02/27/advisory-capitalists-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericjohnolson.com/blog/2006/02/27/advisory-capitalists-2/</link>
	<description>Technology. Innovation. Science. VC. Media. :: by Eric Olson</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fraser</title>
		<link>http://www.ericjohnolson.com/blog/2006/02/27/advisory-capitalists-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ventureweek.com/blog/2006/02/27/advisory-capitalists-2/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Nice additional thoughts to your comment. 

As cash becomes a commodity in the venture industry, competition emerges. How firms compete will be interesting to watch. 

As you point out in your comment, a lower tier VC could "climb the ladder" (or the appropriate analogy) by providing services that entrepreneurs attach considerable value to.

I don't know where this fits in any of the arguements, but someplace in the discussion I read a pointed comment stating that everyone discussing the value of ACs and how they should be paid with equity because they provide services that VCs can't, were, well, ACs.

[also, good for you for reminding people that VCs are not evil individuals].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice additional thoughts to your comment. </p>
<p>As cash becomes a commodity in the venture industry, competition emerges. How firms compete will be interesting to watch. </p>
<p>As you point out in your comment, a lower tier VC could &#8220;climb the ladder&#8221; (or the appropriate analogy) by providing services that entrepreneurs attach considerable value to.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where this fits in any of the arguements, but someplace in the discussion I read a pointed comment stating that everyone discussing the value of ACs and how they should be paid with equity because they provide services that VCs can&#8217;t, were, well, ACs.</p>
<p>[also, good for you for reminding people that VCs are not evil individuals].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
